Subcontractors’ Charges and Security of Payment

While the money is still in the chain, you have leverage. Once it passes up, you have a debt.

Queensland gives unpaid subcontractors two statutory remedies that work on entirely different logic. Adjudication produces a fast decision on what is payable. A subcontractors’ charge attaches to money the party above your contractor still holds, and stops it moving. One gets you an enforceable amount. The other gets you a source of funds. On a project heading for trouble, the second is usually worth more.

Boyle Litigation acts for subcontractors, suppliers and trade contractors securing payment, and for principals, developers and head contractors served with a notice of claim of charge. Litigation is the only work we do.

Two remedies, one objective

Forum selection is the highest leverage decision in a construction dispute, and the one most often made by default. Cost, timetable, the level of disclosure, the treatment of expert evidence, appeal rights and enforceability all move with it.
ForumAdjudicationSubcontractor’charge
What it producesA decision on the amount payable, enforceable as a judgmentA charge over money the higher party owes your contractor
Who it runs againstThe party who owes you under your contractThe party above your contractor in the contracting chain
Main advantageSpeed, and an enforceable amountIt freezes actual funds before they move
Main limitationA decision is only as good as the respondent’s solvencyLimited to money still payable, and not available for damages
Critical windowBusiness days at every stageGenerally three months to give notice, then one month to start proceedings
Best used whenThe debt is clear and the respondent can payThe contractor is slow, disputing, or financially exposed
Forum
What it produces
Who it runs against
Main advantage
Main limitation

Critical window

Best used when
Adjudication
A decision on the amount payable, enforceable as a judgment

The party who owes you under your contract

Speed, and an enforceable amount
A decision is only as good as the respondent’s solvency
Business days at every stage
The debt is clear and the respondent can pay

Subcontractor’charge

A charge over money the higher party owes your contractor

The party above your contractor in the contracting chain
It freezes actual funds before they move
Limited to money still payable, and not available for damages
Generally three months to give notice, then one month to start proceedings
The contractor is slow, disputing, or financially exposed
In practice the two are frequently run together, in a sequence chosen for effect rather than habit. We advise on the combination, not just the individual remedy.

How a subcontractors’ charge works

Chapter 4 of the Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017 (Qld) allows a subcontractor to claim a charge over money that is or becomes payable by a higher party to the contractor for the work. The notice of claim of charge is given in the approved form to the higher party, with a copy to the contractor. Once the notice is given, the higher party must retain the amount claimed and must not pay it on.

The deadline that ends most charges is the second one.

Giving the notice freezes the money. It does not preserve the claim. If a proceeding to enforce the charge is not started within one month after the notice is given, the charge is extinguished and the funds are released. Valid charges are lost this way on amounts far greater than the cost of the whole exercise.

Timing

For money other than retention, notice must generally be given within three months after the subcontract work is completed. For retention, the window generally runs from the date the retention becomes payable. Both are affected by the terms of the subcontract and by what actually happened on site, which is why the completion date is often the first thing in dispute.

What a charge can and cannot secure

We assess the maximum defensible amount before the notice goes out. An accurate charge that will survive challenge is worth considerably more than an inflated one that invites an application to set it aside.

Security of payment: the documents decide the outcome

Most payment disputes are decided by paperwork created before the dispute existed. The payment claim, the payment schedule, and the records connecting the claimed amount to the work carry more weight than any argument made afterwards.

Payment claims

Payment schedules

Retention and trust obligations

Queensland’s project trust and retention trust framework changes where money sits on a project and who has recourse to it. Where trust obligations apply, they affect recovery strategy and the questions worth asking early, including whether amounts have been withheld or dealt with in breach of them. We advise on the practical consequences for your claim and on the obligations currently applying to your project.

Served with a notice of claim of charge

If you are a principal, developer or head contractor and a notice has been served, your obligations begin immediately. Paying the contractor in the ordinary course can expose you to the amount claimed. Equally, an invalid or overstated notice should not be treated as though it were effective, and paying it out is not a neutral choice either.

A notice has landed and the progress claim is due.

This is the point at which principals create liability for themselves. Call before the payment run.

For insolvency practitioners

When a contractor fails mid-project, charges, payment claims and adjudication decisions in various states of completion sit across the file, and the value in them decays quickly. We assess what survives, what can still be enforced, and what is worth funding, and we report in a form you can put to creditors.

Why Boyle Litigation

Frequently asked questions

Written for FAQPage schema. Question text is the schema question; the paragraph following is the accepted answer.

What is a subcontractors’ charge?

A subcontractors’ charge is a statutory remedy under Chapter 4 of the Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017 (Qld). It allows an unpaid subcontractor to claim a charge over money that is or becomes payable by a higher party, such as a principal or head contractor, to the subcontractor’s own contractor. Once notice is given, that money must be retained rather than paid on, which means the funds are still available when judgment is obtained.

For money other than retention, notice must generally be given within three months after the subcontract work is completed. For retention, the period generally runs from the date the retention becomes payable. The subcontract terms and the facts on site both affect when that clock started, so the completion date is often contested. Advice should be taken as soon as payment is in doubt, not once the window is closing.

The higher party must retain the amount claimed and must not pay it to the contractor. The subcontractor must then start a proceeding to enforce the charge within one month after the notice is given. If that step is missed, the charge is extinguished and the money is released. Giving the notice is the beginning of the process, not the end of it.

No. A charge secures money payable for the work done under the subcontract. Claims for damages, including delay and disruption costs, are not secured by a charge and must be pursued separately, usually through court proceedings or arbitration. Including damages in a charge can render the whole notice vulnerable, which is why the claimable amount should be assessed before the notice is given.

It depends on where the money is and how solvent the party owing it is. Adjudication is faster and produces an enforceable amount, which suits a clear debt owed by a party who can pay. A charge is the stronger remedy where the contractor is disputing, slow, or financially exposed, because it attaches to funds still held above them rather than relying on their capacity to pay. Where the contracting chain and the timing allow, both can be used.

In appropriate cases, yes, and the sequencing matters. The two remedies have different windows, different targets, and different evidentiary requirements, and one can undermine the other if the claimed amounts and the reasons given are inconsistent. This is a strategy decision that should be made once, at the start, with both pathways mapped.

Stop the payment and get advice before the next payment run. Once a notice is given, the money claimed must be retained, and paying the contractor in the ordinary course can leave you exposed to the amount claimed. At the same time, an invalid, out of time, or overstated notice should not simply be honoured. Both questions, what to retain and whether the notice is effective, need to be answered quickly.

It can, and that is often the point of using it. A charge given and enforced in time attaches to money held above the contractor, so the funds do not simply fall into the pool available to the contractor’s general creditors. Timing relative to any appointment matters, and so does whether the enforcement proceeding was started within the required period. Where an appointment is imminent, this is a matter of days rather than weeks.

Scroll to Top